E-mail Me! Click Here!
Louisville Music News.net
July 2001 Articles
Cover Story
Jason Koerner
Columns
Berk Bryant
Bob Baker
Decimus Rock
Mike Stout
Paul Moffett
Chris Crain
Keith Clements
Rick Forest
Muffy Junes
Laura Spalding
Jimmy Brown
CD Reviews
David Lilly
Jim Conway
Beth Jones
David Lilly
Jim Conway
Paul Moffett
Bob Mitchell
David Lilly
Performance Reviews
Kevin Gibson
Calendar
Bookmark Louisville Music News.net with these handy
social bookmarking tools:
del.icio.us digg
StumbleUpon spurl
wists simpy
newsvine blinklist
furl blogmarks
yahoo! myweb smarking
ma.gnolia segnalo
reddit fark
technorati cosmos
Available RSS Feeds
Top Picks - Top Picks
Top Picks - Today's Music
Top Picks - Editor's Blog
Top Picks - Articles
Add Louisville Music News' RSS Feed to Your Yahoo!
Add to My Yahoo!
Contact: contact@louisvillemusicnews.net
Louisville, KY 40207
Copyright 1989-2024
Louisvillemusicnews.net, Louisville Music News, Inc.
All Rights Reserved  


Issue:July 2001 Year: 2001
this one
News From The Pit

This Old Guitar
By Jimmy Brown

Last month, I was writing about replicas of old cars and old guitars, specifically, replicas that arrive new in the box looking old and beat-up . Our editor had to cut out some of my deathless prose for lack of space reasons but he promised that the rest would run this month. This is it.

Now, back to the fellow who was shocked at a new guitar showing wear and tear. I can surely understand his reaction. Afterall, new is generally regarded as looking new. I suppose it is not totally unique to guitars, and not all guitars for that matter, but at this moment I can't think of any other examples where something showing age is desirable. This is particularly true with Fender electric guitars. There is something aesthetically pleasing about a vintage Strat or Tele showing wear and tear. Now, to buy a new one and break it in to the extent that it looks decades old, well, I suppose that could take decades to do! And to do it on your own in the way the manufacturer pre ages it is very risky. Believe me, there is a specific method to this aging process. So, when asked why someone would want a new pre aged guitar, and plus be willing to pay more for it, I can more clearly understand. There is a certain aeshetic appeal, which cannot be quantified. In addition, the cost of producing a pre aged Fender or Gibson is greater than not pre aging one. With regard to acoustic guitars, the level of handiwork, cost of materials, and economies of scale factor in to the overall price of the reissues.

Personally, I will always prefer to play my '65 Fender Jazz Bass. Since it is still a relatively affordable and durable instrument, I don't worry too much about it. Now, if and when it hits the 5 digit mark in value, I might have to rethink that. As for today, I am glad to see the guitar makers producing instruments in the spirit of the classics. I come from the generation which got to grow up with all these great guitars. It was nothing to go out and play with these great instruments. Nowadays, it just isn't so practical. If you happen to be fortunate to own one or more of these original beauties, you know you aren't as likely to take it to the gig like you would have twenty or more years ago. It's great that today you can get a new, high quality affordable guitar which at least carries on the tradition of the classic period. Even the car makers are creating cars which evoke the spirit of the classics. The PT Cruiser, the Prowler, the new T-Bird, even the new VW Bug, are examples. Our classic cars and guitars are a storied part of Americana. Perhaps the newest of these items will someday on their own be viewed in the same light as the originals. Only time will tell.

So I guess that's all for now.

Until next time,

Keep Rockin

Bookmark and Share